Skip to content
<!-- Decorative image -->

Negotiating Permissive Pension Changes

City of Glendale (2012) PERB Dec. No. 2251-M (Issued on 04/18/12) This case involves an unfair practice charge for bad faith bargaining filed by the Glendale City Employees Association (Association) against the City Glendale (City). The charge alleged two theories of bad faith bargaining. The one that caught my attention was the allegation that the City negotiated to impasse on a permissive subject of bargaining. The specific issue was a pension cost-sharing proposal by the City.  The parties had previously agreed to a cost-sharing model to deal with increases in PERS pension costs.  The cost-sharing model provided that the City would pay the full…

Read More
<!-- Decorative image -->

PERB: “Who, what, when, where and how” Not Always Necessary in Charge

National Union of Healthcare Workers (2012) PERB Dec. No. 2249-M (Issued on 04/18/12) This unfair practice charge arises out of a decertification election involving in-home support services workers in Fresno County.  The decertification petition was filed by the National Union of Healthcare Workers (NUHW) against the incumbent SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU).  NUHW alleged that SEIU committed unfair practices during the election by 1) interfering with balloting, 2) engaging in physical and verbal threats, 3) misrepresenting information to bargaining unit members, and 4) unlawfully destroying bargaining unit members’ personal property.  NUHW filed an unfair practice charge seeking to have the…

Read More
<!-- Decorative image -->

PERB: Local Rules Can’t Require Peace Officer Only Units if Not Requested

County of Calaveras (2012) PERB Dec. No. 2252-M (Issued on 04/18/12) This case involves an unfair practice charge brought by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) against the County of Calaveras (County).  SEIU alleged that the County committed an unfair practice by violating its own local rules.  Specifically, SEIU alleged that the County approved a mixed bargaining unit of peace officer and non-peace officer classifications in contravention of its local rules which state, “Peace officers and limited term peace officers must be represented in separate units composed solely of such peace officers.” In deciding whether the County committed an unfair practice,…

Read More
<!-- Decorative image -->

Court Affirms PERB Decision Finding That Fee Payers Have No Right to Vote in Union Elections

Williams v. PERB (Court of Appeal Case No. B233494) (Issued on 3/13/12) Members of the bargaining unit represented by the California Faculty Association at California State University, Northridge (CSUN) brought an unfair practice charge alleging that their state and federal rights were violated.  Specifically, charging parties—who are fair share fee payers—alleged that CFA improperly denied them the right to vote on an furlough proposal.  Instead, only members of the union were allowed to vote.  PERB dismissed the charge on the ground that PERB has previously held that unions can exclude non-members from voting so long as the union provides nonmembers an…

Read More
<!-- Decorative image -->

PERB Finds County’s Unit Mod Rule Unreasonable

County of Riverside (2012) PERB Decision No. 2239-M  (Issued on 2/24/12) The Riverside Sheriff’s Association (RSA) wanted to represent a handful of classifications already represented by two other unions.  Under PERB’s regulations (which would apply if the county had no local rules), such an action would be accomplished by filing a severance petition.  However, the county’s local rules do not contain a severance provision.  Instead, the county allows the same action to be accomplished through a unit modification petition.  Under the County’s local rules, a unit modification petition must be accompanied by proof of 15% support.  The question before PERB was 15%…

Read More