Category: Legislation

<!-- Decorative image -->

FAQs on AB 119 – California’s New Employee Orientation Law (Part II)

This is Part II of my FAQ’s related to AB 119.  (Click here for Part 1.) The basics of the bill have been covered in many other places so my focus here is on some of the more technical aspects of the bill.

How does the bargaining process work? AB 119 provides that an employer shall provide the exclusive representative access to the employer’s new employee orientations. The details of this access are left to negotiations between the parties. Either party may request to begin negotiations. (GC 3557(a).) If negotiations are unsuccessful, the bill provides that any remaining disputes are to be resolved through compulsory interest arbitration. (Ibid.)

Read More
<!-- Decorative image -->

FAQs on AB 119 – California’s New Employee Orientation Law (Part I)

By now you’ve heard of the passage of AB 119 which mandates union access to new employee orientations. There is a lot of information out there about this bill, but I know that there are still many questions. I’m going to try to cover some of the most frequently asked questions in a series of posts.

When do I need to begin complying with AB 119?  Now. Most bills take effect on January 1st. However, AB 119 is part of the “Budget Bill” (Cal. Const. , Art IV, §12) which means it takes effect immediately.

Read More
<!-- Decorative image -->

SB 104: Mandates Union Access to Employee Orientations

Last year, in response to Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, public sector unions introduced AB 2835 which would have mandated that public employers provide an “orientation” to new employees during which time the union would be entitled to make a 30-minute presentation.  That bill failed to make it out of the Senate. This year, AB 52 was introduced which would have similarly required that public employers provide new employees an orientation during which time the union would be entitled to participate.  That bill never made it out of the Assembly. However, it appears that public sector union advocates may have…

Read More
<!-- Decorative image -->

A tale of two bills: AB 530 v SB 548

AB 530 was introduced by Assembly Member Cooper on February 13, 2017. This bill would eliminate the peace officer carve-out to PERB’s jurisdiction.  Currently, while peace officers are subject to the MMBA they are not subject to PERB’s jurisdiction. Instead, unfair practice charges from peace officers are handled in superior court. Peace officers have been exempt from PERB's jurisdiction since PERB first took over the MMBA in 2001. Comments: AB 530 stands in sharp contrast to SB 548, which would give firefighters a mechanism to avoid PERB in favor of going to superior court. I wrote about SB 548 here…

Read More
<!-- Decorative image -->

SB 285: Public Employers Cannot Discourage Union Membership

SB 285 was introduced by Senator Atkins (D-San Diego) on February 9, 2017. SB 285 adds the following section to the Government Code: 3550. A public employer shall not deter or discourage public employees from becoming or remaining members of an employee organization. This new provision would apply to all the collective bargaining statutes administered by PERB, including the MMBA, Dills Act, EERA, HEERA, Trial Court Act, and Trial Court Interpreters Act. PERB would have jurisdiction to enforce this provision. Comments: Government Code section 16645 et seq already prohibits the use of state funds to deter union organizing. SB 285…

Read More