San Bernardino County Superior Court (2014) PERB Decision No. A416-E (Issued on 8/26/14)
This case provides a good refresher on PERB’s regulations for serving documents. Here, charging party’s exceptions were served by facsimile and regular mail. After respondent informed charging party that the facsimile was illegible, charging party sent a version via email. The issue before the Board was whether respondent was entitled to additional time to file its response. Respondent argued that charging party’s service by facsimile was defective because it was illegible. Further, respondent argued that it never agreed to accept service by email, so the copy it received via email was simply a courtesy copy. Therefore, respondent asserted that the only proper service was by regular mail, which entitled respondent to another five days to file its response. Based on the proof of service, the Board agreed with respondent’s argument that it was only properly served by mail and therefore its response was timely. But here are some tips for practitioners: